Essay On E-Banking

Free Internet Banking Essay

Is Internet banking the way forward?


In recent years the various forces that are shaping the global economy, in particular processes of globalization, innovation and technological development, international money forms have had a critical bearing and role in the development of capital and securities market that have expanded rapidly as a result (Garrett, 1995). For example, compared with the 1980s today’s mergers and acquisitions continue to break all records the value of these being in 1997 placed at $1 trillion and the current trend for this pace makes it look set to continually and rapidly expand (Gugler, 2001). In relation to these processes then banks play a vital role. They are a key element of global economic activity and thus the trends driving changes in banking are in and of themselves reflective of these global trends. Adaptation and evolution are the key indicators and determinants of continued success and expansion for banks and the transformative technology associated with the rise of the Internet represents both a challenge and a response to challenges for banks. In considering the future role of the Internet in banking it is worthwhile examining the historical development and delineation of the functions of banks

The emergence of models of banking familiar to us is associated with the rise of Italian merchant banks during the Renaissance. Both historically and currently then banks have been associated with developments in accounting procedures, systems dealing with the transfer of payments, new forms of services rendered and the application of technological developments. Additionally to these banks have thus played an important role in the development of the global economy (Hughes & MacDonald, 2002). The emergence of these types, forms and functions of banks can be argued to correspond historically to the emergence of global trade systems in the 16th and 17th centuries which eventually resulted in the ‘commercial revolution’ across the European continent. It is also then not surprising to note that continued processes of globalization are at the heart of trends in banking in the 21st century.

At the heart of banks role within trade was the need for a way for participants in trade to do so safely and conveniently. From this the system of credit was first used and this had a bearing on the acceleration of the development of international trade, a fact which holds true today even if forms are varied. The expansion of banking thus can be seen as a process of developing financial systems which were closely linked to trade and in particular free trade. This fact is reflected in developments subsequent to World War II when the largest growth of the U.S. economy occurred in tandem with the creation of a new order in the international monetary world within the framework of the Bretton Woods agreement and one in which banks became major financial intermediaries.

By the end of 1990s it became apparent that new technologies were driving the financial markets to be truly global in the midst of intense competition. It saw the rise of non-bank financial institutions which sought to provide alternative financial services at both personal and commercial levels. For example, General Electric Capital the financial services subsidiary of General Electric Corporation, supplies credit card facilities to department stores and is the largest insurer of homes in the US (Heffernan, 2002). Similar developments in the UK have seen Marks and Spencer, Tescos and other department stores enter the market offering financial services to their customers. Consequently the globalization of capital markets can be to seen to have pushed banks to seek to develop themselves and differentiate their services utilising new means in both technological applications and service provision to adapt to an ever increasing competitive environment.

As such it is readily acknowledged that for modern banks the strategic use of technology is now a key factor both in terms of restructuring banking systems and as a method of creating new demands for financial services (Heffernan, 2002). Thus considering the dynamic growth and expansion of the Internet at the close of the 20th century it is not surprising to note that the phenomenon of internet banking has expanded dramatically. Indeed this expansion has been accompanied with increased attention on whether this form of banking will become the dominant form of banking in the future. The use of which it is argued will allow banks to keep abreast of trends of globalization and increased competition allowing them to capitalise on continued technological developments associated with internet technologies that break down geographical as well as functional barriers. However, the survival of a banking form depends on whether it is able to adapt to providing the most effective and efficient intermediary and payment service for its customers. Therefore in order to maintain competitive advantage in financial markets banks have to keep pace with the changing nature of what constitutes the roles and functions of being such an intermediary (Bryan, 1991).

According to Heffernan (2002), the existence of traditional banks is due to two main reasons: the necessity of intermediary and payment functions. The role of banks as financial intermediaries is one which sees them as providing a whole range of deposit and loan products but the nature of this role may vary in different ways. The traditional function is one of taking deposits and then lending a percentage of the deposit and according making profits from interest charges. Additionally because of the high cost of generating useful information for lenders in order for them to find the most appropriate borrowers the role of banks in providing such information has become an essential one. Although modern banks operate on international and global scales dealing oftentimes now with truly global customers as well the basic model and functions of banking has not changed even if forms are varied. Yet numerous risks for banks and banking structures have emerged due to this wave of globalization and developments in technology.

Examples of these can be seen in the processes of deregulation which have led to the disappearance of old banking regulations (Mayer, 1993). As a result the range of new products and services which banks must adapt in offering with increased global competition has led them to face new risks as well as new competitors outside the banking system, such as business corporations who have become eager to provide debit services as well. In general then we can surmise that these risks have emanated from increasing competition, product innovation, the movement of capital markets, increased market unpredictability and the removal of old barriers to the provision of financial services (Bessis, 1998). Accordingly because of the significant pressures on banks to minimize risks and the requirement of maintaining capital capability, many banks have made the strategic decision to focus on two stable fee-based profit areas, namely retail banking and private banking.

Retail banking refers to the provision of banking services for individuals, including deposit taking, consumer lending  for house, car, credit card services and so on (Hughes & MacDonald, 2002). However retail banking is a challenging and tough area due to the amounts of product differentiation between services offered and provided which gives rise large amounts of competition between new entrants and established bank branches. In tandem with retail banking private bankers offer services which include deposit-related activities, credit extension and personal lending, and corporate lending (Hughes & MacDonald, 2002). Because they more likely focus on providing services for more well-off individuals, the service demands of these consumers are more sophisticated and professional ones. For example, private bankers may offer complicated financial analysis systems to help clients manage their investment or stock portfolios. Moreover an increasing phenomenon related to clients of banks today are their demands for new money types represented for example by e-cash developments and better profits from their investments all of which contribute to increased pressures for banks.

It is expected an suggested that internet banking may help to solve the problems existing in both these kinds of traditional banking as well as responding in and of themselves for the continued growth of demand for banking online due to customer preferences and needs. First of all internet banking has been suggested as being able to offer economies of scale and low transaction costs. Additionally due to the new target markets which have emerged as a result of internet banking which research suggest seems to be more educated and affluent the advantages of convenience and lower costs are attractive for online banking users. Furthermore the continued emergence and use of e-cash it has been argued may cause an evolution (or revolution) in the traditional banking world lead to increased values and returns in the field of private investment.

However, online banking has its risks some of which may be seen as especially problematic for competing banks. An example of these risks is the networked and online nature of internet banking which increases the risks of security problems from hackers as well as scam artists, ‘phishing’, or the collection of private and personal information from online activities is a growing and prevalent concern. Banks thus must not only compete in terms of the services which they offer but also as to the relative security of their services in comparison with others. It must also be noted that the first investment towards creating an online banking network requires huge capital investment and due to the levels of competition within the sector may in itself led to new entrants failing to make a profit and return on their initial investments. With these factors in mind then we can summate that online banking forms should correspond to the main trends in financial markets as well as display characteristics of a sound organizational risk management system which helps protect customers and is able to contribute to minimizing existing risks for banks and maximise returns on investment for banks.

New Trends in Banking Industry

To understand the future of banking, it is essential to first appreciate the major trends and changes that have a bearing upon banks in terms of how they operate. As such as has been noted one of the most important changes in the financial service sector is due to the process of globalization (Harper & Chan, 2003). This refers to the fact that the geographical location of financial markets operations is no longer important. Examples of this can be seen in the rapid increase of cross-border capital flows and international cooperation in financial regulations and frameworks. Globalization is neither a new phenomenon nor a coincidental one it is inextricably linked with the forms and functions of banks and the provisions and overall structures of financial services provision (Kofman & Youngs, 1996). Thus information based services such as financial services because of the emergence of these world wide informational networks have enabled electronic channels to form which coordinate and manage information relevant to the business of banking (Holland, Lockett & Blackman, 1998).

As a result the demands of global customers have pushed banks to adapt and evolve their organizational structures and the way in which bank products are offered. This has both provided opportunities and new challenges for banks concerned with delivering the most appropriate and effective way of dealing with international/multinational customers. For example while the growth of financial credit markets has bee dramatic and profitable recently it has been rocked by a series of scandals global in their proportions in the UK, US after a brief recovery in international systems as a result of the Asian economic slump (Strange, 1998). Additionally, from a political and social functional perspective of globalization there is an increased awareness of problems focused on the weak points in the traditional financial system. For instance this can be seen in the fact that people are more engaged in financial markets, that this market is more volatile and less workable regulatory frameworks exist arising from national frameworks inability to globally regulate (Eatwell & Taylor, 2000). Consequently customers demand that bank minimize the failure of investment by using sophisticated financial instruments and effective services. It is necessary to ask whether there are possible changes that might be made in the traditional financial system as a result of these trends.

In recent decades, the relationship between financial institutions and regulatory organizations has changed because of the acceleration of globalisation. Historically since the 1930s the financial industry was significantly related to governmental operations (Jordan & Majnoni, 2003). Both in theory and practice, political considerations on the economy and the pressures on and from banks were linked (Aronson, 1977). In this aspect banks have been able to put pressure on governments in order to force governmental changes in policies to improve efficiency and productivity. Thus one of the main reasons for regulating banking activities then as well was in order to enhance the ability of governments in raising revenues. However the emergence of a globalised economy has led to a significant re-conceptualisation of this factor, (Spong, 2002).

As such this analysis presents the reasons for regulating banks today as being related to issues of taxation, of maintaining money supply controls, of protecting some financial suppliers from competition, and the protection of depositors and bank solvency (Benston, 1992). In addition, due to globalization banks have expanded their business to include foreign trade finance lending in different countries which can be called international banking or multinational forms of banking. Unsurprisingly international banks have suffered the stresses of increased government influence and controls over the ways in which they invest and what types of business they undertake. As a result of this it is argued that the process of selection of the most effective banking form is less through competition as opposed to being through the actions of politicians and regulators (Jones, 1990). Research has been carried out in the USA, UK, Japan and European Union which has demonstrated that there is still a large deficit in the coordination of international bank supervision (Canals, 1997). Although it is said the governments have gradually reduced the importance of their roles in banking innovation within the relationship between banking activities and the supervision of government is a key element for the growth quality financial products and services in the global economy (Avgerou and La Rovere, 2003).

The banking industry is also highly affected by the evolution of technology. In this area some of the most dramatic changes in banking business have occurred and are occurring. Compared to past perspectives in which banks were afraid of the uncertainties in relation to making heavy investments in technology, today for those who seek a competitive edge investing heavily in the development of technology is a major factor of their respective strategic operations (Meric & Meric, 2001). This is not surprising when it is considered that technology has enabled the banking industry to innovate in terms of new ranges of financial products, distribution channels for these services and better customer relationship management systems. For example, the computerization of the standard transaction model has reduced the need for paper records and checks. In addition, taking Egypt as an example there have been many changes in banking such as the way of delivering financial services by using the internet and electronic cash a feature then we can say that is being replicated both in developed and developing countries (Kamel & Hassan, 2003).

However, these changes present both opportunities and threats. The developments taking place in information and communication technology have increased the levels of competition for financial institutions. For new players entering the market they even it can be stated have an advantage in its ‘legacy system’ compared with traditional banks and the ease of access to technological implementations has attracted many new entrants to the sector. Therefore the usage of technology in order to create competitive advantages is essential for banks particularly for those involved in retail banking (Harper, Randall & Rouncefield, 2000).

Powerful forces then have shaped the banking industry including it must be noted changing customer needs and their choices of financial services. By the middle of the 1990s internet based services had rapidly emerged in usage and coverage, such as for example E-mail and these non-financial usages have led to their application and deployment in creating a new way of banking (Wiggins, 1995). Furthermore, there has been a trend for individuals to invest their savings such as their retirement money rather than saving it in traditional deposit accounts in banks so as to seek higher return rates on their money which reflects these changing customer needs. While traditional banking systems offered high level of commercial risks a growing emerging feature has been the alternative of non-banking sectors, including for example mutual funds.

One of the end results of these trends is that because global customers’ needs have changed, their preferences in turn have become more complicated and sophisticated in outlook towards the financial services they have a preference for. They are more aware and indulge more in financial analysis and the possible options available to them for increasing the value of their monetary assets, thus traditional banking systems appear to be less attractive to these sets of customers than they were in the past. This makes banks develop or seek to develop ways of meeting this challenge and be responsive to the key trends related to effectively operating in the banking sector. Customers it seems are enthusiastic in relation to these development with research for example from Canada showing a majority declaring their willingness in dealing with all of their bank bills or investments via the Internet by 2003 (Hien, 2000).

What Do Banks do?

To consider modern banking in the context of a traditional model, banking activities in industrialized economies can be seen as being a function of their role as financial intermediaries between depositors and borrowers as well as being instruments of payments. In regards to the former the intermediary and payment instrument have been identified thus it is necessary to address the organisational structure of banks which are most successful in carrying out these identifiable functions. According to Kovacevich (2000), winners in this industry will be those who can master the management of information and use it to give their customers what they want as well as when and where they want it, or in other words those who can assimilate knowledge in such a manner as to be responsive to dynamically changing customer needs and preferences. Therefore effective banking structures are those that are able to support the interactions of information and financial services.

Such a structure is also efficient, according to Williamson (1981), it is argued to those who are able to ‘economise’ on the costs of banking services. In other words banking activities that can be divided into four levels are closely related to profitability. Namely treasury and banking transactions, intermediation, financial assets, and long run activities including fixed assets and equity plus long term debt management and financing are major sections of banking operations. However the relative weight accorded to these functions will depend on the different kinds of banks involved (Beaver & Parker, 1995). For example, many banks are engaged in international or multinational business for a short time due to globalization, their presence in which does not contrary to the basic banking model, but makes them pay more attention to the needs of their global customers and which requires links to global targets matching with their business decisions.

New challenges can be created during the process of internationalisation as a result of the major trends in banking analyzed previously (Classens and Jansen, 2000). Nonetheless, a recent view on traditional banking model holds that the contribution of physical banks to the growth of the global economy has been diminishing significantly over time; new financial instruments and technologies such as online banking will not be then be seen as a one component of a new strategy but in effect the new strategy for banks to maintain their traditional functions in the face of external competition (Baker, 2002). Therefore there is a multiplicity of arguments concerning the new form of banking model yet a recurring emphasis on the dominance of the internet to the future form of this model. Furst and Nolle (2000) defined the term of electronic banking as meaning a distant delivery channel which is used for banking services. Thus with the increased competition, increased costs, changing customer needs and preferences along with the rapidly changing global context in which banks operate one of the key questions to be asked is that along with the electronic provisions of services will there be a reduction in the actual physical presence of banks and thus an end as such to the physical bank to be replaced by an online electronic one.

The Future of Banking

E-banking is a global phenomenon yet the newness of technologies associated with it should not be taken to mean that electronic banking itself is new. We can see developments in electronic banking as far back as 1871, when the West Union Telegraph Company headquartered in New York began to offer a nationwide money-transfer service (Ridgway, 2000). Similarly in 1951, the first credit card was issued by Franklin National Bank and the first ATM machines came into operation at City National Bank of Columbus in America (Gup, 2003). . It is estimated that by 2000 there were about 285000 ATMs in operation in the US (Spong, 2000) with similar large network coverage of such across the EU, the UK and globally increasing also (McDonald and Keasey, 2002). The internet exploded onto the international scene in the 1980s and 1990s and the rapid evolution of the technology and the possible applications led to many surmising and trialling the offering of banking services making use of the medium, yet such efforts were viewed as being risky as well as generating only minimal profits.

This may be the main reason for low levels of popularity towards banking online historically and to a degree presently. Because of the low percentage of customers who have access to such services and the huge cost of setting up internet banking web sites, it is unlikely that at present internet banking is having a major influence on the profitability of most institutions. Yet the continued roll-out of internet technologies such as always-on broadband connections may it can be hypothesised dramatically alter this situation over the coming period. Those banks that rely primarily at present then on internet banking must be able to afford the huge costs involved in setting up their operations as well as run the risks feared by smaller institutions that has led to their closure related to making such a large investment and risking it on future profits. Therefore with the exception of the largest institutions most efforts towards performing banking online failed or did not have a detectable strong influence on the banking model in smaller banks (Furst & Nolle, 2000). However the usage of ATM machines has spread rapidly because of driving forces in the economic situation at that time. Analysts such as Moore (1984) believe that rising inflation and interest rates are key contributors to the strategy made by banks towards attracting customers through using ATMs.

On the one hand customers require cheaper and more convenient ways to withdraw and access their money; on the other hand banks are able to afford the investment of installation of ATMs to maintain consumer loyalty through charges levied on the use of such systems. By the 1980s another factor which had a major bearing on the usage of ATMs was that the construction and operational cost for traditional bank branches increased significantly, including the cost for human resources and other fixed costs associated with the construction and maintenance of physical branches (Cobas, Mote & Wilcox, 2001). ATMs were seen to be a vehicle to help banks compete with other financial sectors world wide at a much lower level of cost than through the opening of physical bank branches. In addition customers were more likely to accept this form of dealing with their banking business including the payment of bills and withdrawing of money. As a result, banks required less of a physical presence. This trend of reducing a banks physical presence can be seen in the ever increasing exhortation towards internet and online banking which occurred.  In 2000,  using West Union as an example again, which is now owned by First Data Corporation started to offer its services over the Internet (Ridgway, 2000).

The rapid development of internet and its growth of usage among not only companies but also individuals has accelerated the development of internet banking. At first financial institutions only offered web sites that provided information about services which they offered rather than actually offering to perform the services themselves. Such trends are common in relation to the internet and replicated in other industries, such as the travel industry.  However banks and other financial intermediaries gradually realized that one of the emerging characteristics of their industry was the in provision of financial information which required they provide services and financial products that enable them to have closer and better relationships with customers. It thus came to be held that the internet makes such a function possible.

Customers are encouraged to use a computer in order to access banks by using banking software installed on their personal computer while they may use internet service providers in order to access banks through their websites. Importantly research among internet banking users has found that high net worth customers preferred a combination of internet based tools as well as a close relationship with a personal banker (Labate, 2001). As such there is a dual trend both for reducing physical presence but increasing the ‘personal touch’, a difficult balancing act for many banks to maintain. Additionally a leading online broker has reported that about 70 percent of its new accounts are opened at branch offices rather than online ones (Bekier, Flur and Sinham, 2000). The most successful e-banking institutions therefore are likely only to be those with strong brand identity and which are able to balance the competing and often contradictory needs of its customers. Therefore before make a conclusion as to the future direction of banking it is vital to have a clear understanding of the role of electronic banking in the context of the global financial industry.

Internet banking it is claimed is faster, better and cheaper for all concerned than traditional forms and methods of banking. Convenience, which refers to an overall reduction in the capital, labor, time and other resources that are needed and expended in order to make transactions is one of the key advantages for both customers and banks (Hunter and Timme, 2001). For example, customers are able to control their finances by easily accessing their online account for where they can perform a variety of financial functions without the need for a cashier. The services of reviewing bills, initiating payments and so on online are provided by most banks now. The reduction of costs of time and money expense is ranked as one of the most important considerations by consumers who prefer use of electronic bill paying services. In addition online banking services also benefit the business to business sector in the financial industry. According to Mester (2001), by 1998, 86 percent of households used some form of e-payment system with ATMs and direct deposit being the most widely used, and the growth of retail e-payment is being driven by the increased use of credit cards, which is the second most popular means of non-cash payments. Although it is assumed that the bank’s leading role in the home mortgage market will be reduced over time due to increased competition from non-banking institutions some insurance products however such as term insurance and long-term care insurance are expected to do well online and represent new areas of activities for traditional banks (Barta, 2001).

Secondly traditional banking risks are defined as credit risks, liquidity risks, interest rate risks, market risks, foreign exchange risks and solvency risks (Schroeck, 2002). Internet banking may be viewed as having certain definitive advantages compared with traditional banking models in managing, controlling as well as minimizing these risks. For example the Identrus Global Trust Service helps banks and their customers carry out secure payments online and deal with other risk management systems ( The role of information and impacts of adverse selection have been examined extensively in connection with lending money, and today, a substantial amount of lending is done over the internet with forecasts all suggesting that this is set to increase and replace the traditional model of a customer meeting in person with a loan advisor (E-banking Strategies in Europe, 2003).

Although internet banks can provide a wide range of financial services the incidence of specific risks which include operational, security, and legal risks, affect both the users and providers of such services. First of all the efficient flow of information to and regarding customers is at the heart of the industry but the ease of gathering customers’ personal information in an online environment creates security risks which are a factor in customer decisions on which bank to bank with. Measures such as privacy notices contain the type of information that can not be collected and how it may be used (Gup, 2003) and are often backed by national and supranational regulation, such as EU directives on freedom and use of information. However, financial service providers argue that the cost of restricting the use of consumer information and the costs of extensively securing this information will reduce the services that can be offered to customers, such as slower responses to loan applications.

Secondly, as mentioned before the extensive use of ATMs offer a response to demands of convenience in making deposits and withdrawing cash which can be seen as competing with online banking. Additionally, research has revealed that cheques continue to be seen as an important transactional tool for customers and will not be replaced due to its perceived higher level of security over other methods (Munir, 2004). Therefore e-banking can be seen as part of complex set of arrangements emerging in response to dynamic customer needs and specifically related to a younger demographic element making use of extended banking services. Therefore it is unsurprising to note that most e-banking users seem to be younger, more affluent and more educated. It is fair to say that greater convenience may increase security risks, and greater complexity may reduce convenience resulting in a difficult task for banks to blend and balance all of these elements.

Thus in summation it can be suggested that while internet banking has been foreseen as the way forward the reality of its uptake leads to the conclusion that it has become one part of the way forward, leading in particular to increased differentiation among banking products and access to these products to a wider set of customers (Clemons and Hitt, 2000). However the existence of online transaction channels alone may not be sufficient for many customers in that while some services are demanded and preferred online other services still are seen as requiring both a human and physical element in conducting the transaction (McDonald & Keasey, 2002). As while the use of internet banking is growing there is still a strong demand and it is likely to continue to be a demand for the foreseeable future for physical banks.


Aronson, J. (1977) Money and Power: Banks and the World Monetary System, Sage Publications, Inc, London UK

Avgerou C. and La Rovere R. L. (2003) Information Systems and the Economics of Innovation, Edward Elgar Pub., Cheltenham

Baker, J. (2002) The Bank for International Settlements: evolution and evaluation, Quorum Books

Benston, G. (1992) ‘Why Continue to Regulate Banks? An Historical Assessment of Federal Banking Regulations’, in Chew, D. (ed) New Developments in Commercial Banking, Blackwell Publishers, USA.

Barta, P. (2001) Why Lenders Fear Mortgage Giants Will Steal Their Turf, Wall Street Journal, April 5.

Beaver, W. & Parker, G. (1995) Risk Management: Problems and Solutions, McGraw-Hill, New York.

Bessis, J. (1998) Risk Management in Banking, John Wiley & Sons Ltd, London UK

Bryan, L. L. (1991) Bankrupt: Restoring the Health and Profitability of Our Banking System, HarperBusiness, New York

Bekier, M., Flur, D. & Singham, S. (2000) A Future for Bricks and Mortar, U.S Banker, October 2000.

Canals, J. (1997) Universal Banking: International Comparisons and Theoretical Perspectives, Oxford University Press, Oxford

Classens S. and Jansen, M. [eds] (2000) The Internationalisation of Financial Services: Issues and Lessons for Developing Countries, Kluwer Academic Press, Boston

Clemons, E. & Hitt, L. (2000) The Internet and the Future of Financial Services: Transparency, Differential Pricing and Disintermediation, Wharton Financial Institution Center.

Cobas, M., Mote, L. & Wilcox, J. (2001) The History of the Future of Banking: Predictions and Outcomes, Office of the Controller of the Currency, USA.

E-banking Strategies in Europe: Which Way Now? (2003), Datamonitor, London

Furst, K., Lang, W. & Nolle, D. (2000) Internet Banking: Developments and Prospects, Office of the Comptroller of the Currency.

Garrett, G. (1995) ‘Capital Mobility, Trade and the Domestic Politics of Economic Policy’, International Organisation, Vol 49 No 4

Gugler, K. (2001) ‘Takeovers and the market for corporate control’, in Gugler, K. (ed) Corporate Governance and Economic Performance, Oxford University Press, Oxford New York.

Gup, B. (2003) Electronic Banking, in Gup, B.(ed) The Future of Banking, Quorum Books.

Harper,I. & Chan, T. (2003) The Future of Banking: A Global Perspective, in Gup, B. (ed) The Future of Banking, Quorum Books.

Harper, R., Randall, D. & Rouncefield, M. (2000) Organisational Change and Retail Finance: An Ethnographic Perspective, Routledge, London.

Heffernan, S. (2002) Modern Banking in Theory and Practice, John Wiley & Sons Ltd, UK.

Hien, D. (2000) Half of the Canadian Say They Will Bank via Internet by 2003, Bloomberg, April 18th.

Holland, C., Lockett, A. & Blackman, I. (1998) Global Strategies to Overcome the Spiral of Decline in Universal Bank Market, Journal of Strategic Information System.

Hughes, J. & MacDonald, S. (2002) International Banking: Text and Cases, Pearson Education Inc, USA.

Hunter, W.C. and Timme, S. (2001) ‘Technological Change in Large US Commercial Banks’, Journal of Business, No. 64

Jones, G. (1990) ‘Banks as Multinationals’, in Jones, G. (ed) Banks as Multinationals, Routlege, New York.

Jordan, C. & Majnoni, G. (2003) Regulatory Harmonization and the Globalization of Finance, in Hanson, J., Honohan, P. & Majnoni, G.(eds) Globalization and National Financial Systems, World Bank, Washington, USA.

Kamel, S. & Hassan, A. (2003) Assessing the Introduction of Electronic Banking in Egypt Using the Technology Acceptance Model, Idea Group Pub.

Kofman, E. & Youngs, G. (1996) Globalization: Theory and Practice, Biddles Limited, UK.

Labate, J. (2001) Ameritrade to Cut Workforce, Financial Times, January 8.

McDonald, O. & Keasey, K. (2002) The Future of Retail Banking in Europe, J. Wiley, New York.

Mayer, C. (1993) ‘The Regulation of Financial Services: Lessons from the United Kingdom’, in Dermine, J., European Banking in the 1990s, Blackwell Publishers, Oxford, USA.

Meric, I. & Meric, G. (2001) ‘Global Financial Markets at the Turn of the Century’, in Meric, I. & Meric, G. (eds) Global Financial Markets at the Turn of the Century, Pergamon, New York.

Moore, J. (1984) Competition Remains Driving Force Behind ATM Installations, Bank Systems and Equipment, Vol 21 January.

Munir, A. B. (2004) Internet Banking: Law and Practice, LexisNexis, London

Ridgway, N. (2000) Down to the Wire, Forbes, November 13.

Schroeck, G. (2002) Risk Management and Value Creation in Financial Institutions, John Wiley.

Spong, K. (2000) Banking Regulation: Its Purposes, Implementation, and Effects 5th ed, Federal Reserve Bank of Kansa City.

Strange, S. (1998) Mad Money, Manchester University Press, UK.

Wiggins, R. W. (1995) The Internet for Everyone: A Guide for Users and Providers, McGraw Hill, New York

Williamson, O. (1981) ‘The Modern Corporation: Origins, Evolution, Attributes’, Economic Literature, No. 19.

Source: Essay UK -

Not what you're looking for?

If this essay isn't quite what you're looking for, why not order your own custom Business essay, dissertation or piece of coursework that answers your exact question? There are UK writers just like me on hand, waiting to help you. Each of us is qualified to a high level in our area of expertise, and we can write you a fully researched, fully referenced complete original answer to your essay question. Just complete our simple order form and you could have your customised Business work in your email box, in as little as 3 hours.

Linda Senior Lecturer in Economics, Essay UK Researcher Team.

Online banking, also known as internet banking, it is an electronic payment system that enables customers of a bank or other financial institution to conduct a range of financial transactions through the financial institution's website. The online banking system will typically connect to or be part of the core banking system operated by a bank and is in contrast to branch banking which was the traditional way customers accessed banking services.

To access a financial institution's online banking facility, a customer with internet access will need to register with the institution for the service, and set up a password and other credentials for customer verification. The credentials for online banking is normally not the same as for telephone or mobile banking. Financial institutions now routinely allocate customers numbers, whether or not customers have indicated an intention to access their online banking facility. Customer numbers are normally not the same as account numbers, because a number of customer accounts can be linked to the one customer number. Technically, the customer number can be linked to any account with the financial institution that the customer controls, though the financial institution may limit the range of accounts that may be accessed to, say, cheque, savings, loan, credit card and similar accounts.

The customer visits the financial institution's secure website, and enters the online banking facility using the customer number and credentials previously set up. The types of financial transactions which a customer may transact through online banking are determined by the financial institution, but usually includes obtaining account balances, a list of the recent transactions, electronic bill payments and funds transfers between a customer's or another's accounts. Most banks also enable a customer to download copies of bank statements, which can be printed at the customer's premises (some banks charge a fee for mailing hard copies of bank statements). Some banks also enable customers to download transactions directly into the customer's accounting software. The facility may also enable the customer to order a cheque book, statements, report loss of credit cards, stop payment on a cheque, advise change of address and other routine actions.

Today, many banks are internet-only institutions. These "virtual banks" have lower overhead costs than their brick-and-mortar counterparts. In the United States, many online banks are insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) and can offer the same level of protection for the customers' funds as traditional banks.[1]


This section appears to contradict itself. Please see the talk page for more information.(January 2016)


The precursor for the modern home loan banking services were the distance banking services over electronic media from the early 1980s. The term 'online' became popular in the late 1980s and referred to the use of a terminal, keyboard and TV (or monitor) to access the banking system using a phone line. 'Home banking' can also refer to the use of a numeric keypad to send tones down a phone line with instructions to the bank. Online services started in New York in 1981 when four of the city's major banks (Citibank, Chase Manhattan, Chemical and Manufacturers Hanover) offered home banking services.[2][3][4] using the videotex system. Because of the commercial failure of videotex, these banking services never became popular except in France (where the use of videotex (Minitel) was subsidised by the telecom provider) and the UK, where the Prestel system was used.

Internet and customer reluctance[edit]

When the clicks-and-bricks euphoria hit in the late 1990s, many banks began to view web-based banking as a strategic imperative. The attraction of banks to online banking are fairly obvious: diminished transaction costs, easier integration of services, interactive marketing capabilities, and other benefits that boost customer lists and profit margins. Additionally, online banking services allow institutions to bundle more services into single packages, thereby luring customers and minimizing overhead.

A mergers-and-acquisitions wave swept the financial industries in the mid- and late 1990s, greatly expanding banks' customer bases. Following this, banks looked to the Web as a way of maintaining their customers and building loyalty. A number of different factors are causing bankers to shift more of their business to the virtual realm.

While financial institutions took steps to implement e-banking services in the mid-1990s, many consumers were hesitant to conduct monetary transactions over the internet. It took widespread adoption of electronic commerce, based on trailblazing companies such as America Online, and eBay, to make the idea of paying for items online widespread. By 2000, 80% of U.S. banks offered e-banking. Customer use grew slowly. At Bank of America, for example, it took 10 years to acquire 2 million e-banking customers. However, a significant cultural change took place after the Y2K scare ended. In 2001, Bank of America became the first bank to top 3 million online banking customers, more than 20% of its customer base. In comparison, larger national institutions, such as Citigroup claimed 2.2 million online relationships globally, while J.P. Morgan Chase estimated it had more than 750,000 online banking customers. Wells Fargo had 2.5 million online banking customers, including small businesses. Online customers proved more loyal and profitable than regular customers. In October 2001, Bank of America customers executed a record 3.1 million electronic bill payments, totaling more than $1 billion. In 2009, a report by Gartner Group estimated that 47% of United States adults and 30% in the United Kingdom bank online.

The early 2000s saw the rise of the branch-less banks as internet only institutions. These internet-based banks incur lower overhead costs than their brick-and-mortar counterparts. In the United States, deposits at most direct banks are FDIC-insured and offer the same level of insurance protection as traditional banks.

First online banking services in the United States[edit]

Online banking was first introduced in the early 1980s in New York, United States.[5] Four major banks — Citibank, Chase Bank, Chemical Bank and Manufacturers Hanover — offered home banking services. Chemical introduced its Pronto services for individuals and small businesses in 1983, which enabled individual and small-business clients to maintain electronic checkbook registers, see account balances, and transfer funds between checking and savings accounts. Pronto failed to attract enough customers to break even and was abandoned in 1989. Other banks had a similar experience.

Since its inception in the United States, online banking has been federally governed by the Electronic Funds Transfer Act of 1978.[citation needed]

Stanford Federal Credit Union was the first financial institution to offer online internet banking services to all of its members in October 1994.[6]

First online banking in the United Kingdom[edit]

Almost simultaneously with the United States, online banking arrived in the United Kingdom. The UK's first home online banking services known as Homelink was set up by Bank of Scotland for customers of the Nottingham Building Society (NBS) in 1983. The system used was based on the UK's Prestel viewlink system and used a computer, such as the BBC Micro, or keyboard (Tandata Td1400) connected to the telephone system and television set. The system allowed on-line viewing of statements, bank transfers and bill payments. In order to make bank transfers and bill payments, a written instruction giving details of the intended recipient had to be sent to the NBS who set the details up on the Homelink system. Typical recipients were gas, electricity and telephone companies and accounts with other banks. Details of payments to be made were input into the NBS system by the account holder via Prestel. A cheque was then sent by NBS to the payee and an advice giving details of the payment was sent to the account holder. BACS was later used to transfer the payment directly.

First online banking in France[edit]

After a test period with 2,500 users starting in 1994, online banking services were launched in 1998,[7] using Minitel terminals that were distributed freely to the population by the government.

By 1990, 6.5 million Minitels were installed in households. Online banking was one of the most popular services.

Online banking services later migrated to Internet.

Banks and the World Wide Web[edit]

Around 1994, banks saw the rising popularity of the internet as an opportunity to advertise their services. Initially, they used the internet as another brochure, without interaction with the customer. Early sites featured pictures of the bank's officers or buildings, and provided customers with maps of branches and ATM locations, phone numbers to call for further information and simple listings of products.

Interactive banking on the Web[edit]

In 1995, Wells Fargo was the first U.S. bank to add account services to its website, with other banks quickly following suit. That same year, Presidential became the first U.S. bank to open bank accounts over the internet. According to research by Online Banking Report, at the end of 1999 less than 0.4% of households in the U.S. were using online banking. At the beginning of 2004, some 33 million U.S. households (31%) were using some form of online banking. Five years later, 47% of Americans used online banking, according to a survey by Gartner Group. Meanwhile, in the UK online banking grew from 63% to 70% of internet users between 2011 and 2012.[8]


Online banking facilities typically have many features and capabilities in common, but also have some that are application specific. The common features fall broadly into several categories:

  • A bank customer can perform non-transactional tasks through online banking, including:
    • Viewing account balances
    • Viewing recent transactions
    • Downloading bank statements, for example in PDF format
    • Viewing images of paid cheques
    • Ordering cheque books
    • Download periodic account statements
    • Downloading applications for M-banking, E-banking etc.
  • Bank customers can transact banking tasks through online banking, including:
    • Funds transfers between the customer's linked accounts
    • Paying third parties, including bill payments (see, e.g., BPAY) and third party fund transfers (see, e.g., FAST)
    • Investment purchase or sale
    • Loan applications and transactions, such as repayments of enrollments
    • Credit card applications
    • Register utility billers and make bill payments
  • Financial institution administration
  • Management of multiple users having varying levels of authority
  • Transaction approval process

Some financial institutions offer special internet banking services, for example:

  • Personal financial management support, such as importing data into personal accounting software. Some online banking platforms support account aggregation to allow the customers to monitor all of their accounts in one place whether they are with their main bank or with other institutions.


There are some advantages to using e-banking both for banks and customers:

  • Permanent access to the bank
  • Access anywhere using mobile or computer
  • Less time consuming
  • Very safe and secure method
  • Helps to transfer the money immediately and accurately
  • Easy to use
  • good for health


Security of a customer's financial information is very important, without which online banking could not operate. Similarly the reputational risks to the banks themselves are important.[8] Financial institutions have set up various security processes to reduce the risk of unauthorized online access to a customer's records, but there is no consistency to the various approaches adopted.

The use of a secure website has been almost universally embraced.

Though single passwordauthentication is still in use, it by itself is not considered secure enough for online banking in some countries. Basically there are two different security methods in use for online banking:

  • The PIN/TAN system where the PIN represents a password, used for the login and TANs representing one-time passwords to authenticate transactions. TANs can be distributed in different ways, the most popular one is to send a list of TANs to the online banking user by postal letter. Another way of using TANs is to generate them by need using a security token. These token generated TANs depend on the time and a unique secret, stored in the security token (two-factor authentication or 2FA).
More advanced TAN generators (chipTAN) also include the transaction data into the TAN generation process after displaying it on their own screen to allow the user to discover man-in-the-middle attacks carried out by Trojans trying to secretly manipulate the transaction data in the background of the PC.[9]
Another way to provide TANs to an online banking user is to send the TAN of the current bank transaction to the user's (GSM) mobile phone via SMS. The SMS text usually quotes the transaction amount and details, the TAN is only valid for a short period of time. Especially in Germany, Austria and the Netherlands many banks have adopted this "SMS TAN" service.
Usually online banking with PIN/TAN is done via a web browser using SSL secured connections, so that there is no additional encryption needed.
  • Signature based online banking where all transactions are signed and encrypted digitally. The Keys for the signature generation and encryption can be stored on smartcards or any memory medium, depending on the concrete implementation (see, e.g., the Spanish ID cardDNI electrónico[10]).


Attacks on online banking used today are based on deceiving the user to steal login data and valid TANs. Two well known examples for those attacks are phishing and pharming. Cross-site scripting and keylogger/Trojan horses can also be used to steal login information.

A method to attack signature based online banking methods is to manipulate the used software in a way, that correct transactions are shown on the screen and faked transactions are signed in the background.

A 2008 U.S. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation Technology Incident Report, compiled from suspicious activity reports banks file quarterly, lists 536 cases of computer intrusion, with an average loss per incident of $30,000. That adds up to a nearly $16-million loss in the second quarter of 2007. Computer intrusions increased by 150 percent between the first quarter of 2007 and the second. In 80 percent of the cases, the source of the intrusion is unknown but it occurred during online banking, the report states.[11]

Another kind of attack is the so-called man-in-the-browser attack, a variation of the man-in-the-middle attack where a Trojan horse permits a remote attacker to secretly modify the destination account number and also the amount in the web browser.

As a reaction to advanced security processes allowing the user to cross-check the transaction data on a secure device there are also combined attacks using malware and social engineering to persuade the user himself to transfer money to the fraudsters on the ground of false claims (like the claim the bank would require a "test transfer" or the claim a company had falsely transferred money to the user's account and he should "send it back").[12][13] Users should therefore never perform bank transfers they have not initiated themselves.


There exist several countermeasures which try to avoid attacks. Digital certificates are used against phishing and pharming, in signature based online banking variants (HBCI/FinTS) the use of "Secoder" card readers is a measurement to uncover software side manipulations of the transaction data.[14] To protect their systems against Trojan horses, users should use virus scanners and be careful with downloaded software or e-mail attachments.

In 2001, the U.S. Federal Financial Institutions Examination Council issued guidance for multifactor authentication (MFA) and then required to be in place by the end of 2006.[15]

In 2012, the European Union Agency for Network and Information Security advised all banks to consider the PC systems of their users being infected by malware by default and therefore use security processes where the user can cross-check the transaction data against manipulations like for example (provided the security of the mobile phone holds up) SMS TAN where the transaction data is sent along with the TAN number or standalone smartcard readers with an own screen including the transaction data into the TAN generation process while displaying it beforehand to the user (see chipTAN) to counter man-in-the-middle attacks.[16]

See also[edit]


  1. ^"Safe Internet Banking". GOBankingRates. FDIC. 2016-01-11. Retrieved 2016-07-20. 
  2. ^Cronin, Mary J. (1997). Banking and Finance on the Internet, John Wiley and Sons. ISBN 0-471-29219-2 page 41 from Banking and Finance on the Internet. Retrieved 2008-07-10. 
  3. ^"The Home Banking Dilemma". Retrieved 2008-07-10. 
  4. ^"Computer Giants Giving a Major Boost to Increased Use of Corporate Videotex". Communications News. 1584. Retrieved 2008-07-10. 
  5. ^"Banking and Finance on the Internet," edited by Mary J. Cronin
  6. ^"Stanford Federal Credit Union Pioneers Online Financial Services" (Press release). 1995-06-21. 
  7. ^
  8. ^ abAbdou, Hussein, English, John and Adewunmi, Paul An investigation of risk management practices in electronic banking: the case of the UK banks, University of Huddersfield, July 22, 2014 (PDF; 474 kB)
  9. ^chipTAN (Sicherungsverfahren im Online-Banking), Sparkasse KölnBonn (AöR), Retrieved on April 10, 2014.
  10. ^DNI electrónico de España/Spanish ID-card
  11. ^Security Flaws in Online Banking Sites Found to be Widespread Newswise, Retrieved on July 23, 2008.
  12. ^Tatanga Attack Exposes chipTAN Weaknesses, September 4, 2012
  13. ^Trojaner gaukelt Fehlüberweisung vor Heise Security, June 1, 2013
  14. ^Secoder 2.0-SStarMoney, Star Finanz-Software Entwicklung und Vertriebs GmbH, Retrieved on November 18, 2015.
  15. ^OCC 2005-35
  16. ^“High Roller” online bank robberies reveal security gaps European Union Agency for Network and Information Security, July 5, 2012

External links[edit]

  • Gandy, T. (1995): "Banking in e-space", The banker, 145 (838), pp. 74–76.
  • Tan, M.; Teo, T. S. (2000): "Factors influencing the adoption of Internet banking", Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 1 (5), pp. 1–42.


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *